"I bridle at the idea that good stuff could be public in the first place, that I should have to share my tastes with the wider world. My love of knowledge-hoarding was part snobbishness, part proprietary, part nesting: I liked the idea that my favorite movies, books and music are for me and a select few others, because they’re special and they’re part of my life. To think that everyone in the world might love them just as much makes me feel like a salt molecule in a tub of brine. Like friendship, taste should be somewhat exclusive — your friends are the ones you choose above all the other bozos. If everybody is friends, then no one is, really. The same applies to being fans of Arcade Fire."
NYTimes | Why the Old-School Music Snob Is the Least Cool Kid on Twitter
Here is what I think about when I encounter stuff like this:
In middle and high school, my family had one computer—a Compaq Presario desktop with weird purple accents, if you’re wondering—that the four of us all shared. A pretty typical setup for the late 90s/early 00s, I guess. For a while this was fine because mostly I was the only one in the house that cared about the internet, but when my younger sister Sarah got a little bit older (she’s three years younger than me) it got a little tricky. I guess this was before there was the option to have multiple desktops on a Windows machine, or maybe we just didn’t know about it.
Anyway, there was a lot of squabbling and sniping not just about who got to use the computer and when, but what ownership either of us had on the stuff that wound up on the computer. This was during the Napster heyday, or maybe just after it—maybe AudioGalaxy was the thing then, I don’t remember. At any rate that’s how I was getting most of my music at the time, not even whole albums, just totally random tracks I’d download whenever I read about some artist that sounded interesting in Spin or Rolling Stone or on any number of the “online diaries” of total strangers that I followed (this was even pre-LiveJournal, I think; Lindsey, you were most likely one of them!).
All questions of ethics aside, this was super super important to me in terms of developing my own musical tastes, and I discovered so many artists that way—gosh, I can’t even remember exactly what now, but probably lots of Jeff Buckley, Elvis Costello, weird old Ben Folds Five b-sides and bootlegs; I remember downloading a whole scrapped album by Kara’s Flowers, the band that became Maroon 5; some band called Starlet that I think might’ve actually been a fairly legit Swedish indie-pop act, I don’t know. It all felt very special and private.
I was thinking about this earlier, kind of, because I just registered rachaelmaddux.com which is something I’ve been vaguely desiring to do since I was about thirteen or fourteen, back when it seemed definitely like something someone could do, but I had no idea how, and it also felt like definitely something my parents wouldn’t be OK with. I mean, in 7th grade when I bounded into the kitchen and proudly announced that I had signed up for my first email account—mushmellow1214@hotmail.com, if you’re wondering, whatever the hell that meant—they reacted not with the gushing pride and excitement I’d expected but with absolute stricken horror, and then my dad made me print out the terms and conditions agreement and read the whole thing before he let me actually use the address. And I realized today that back then the internet was kind of my Narnia, this strange world where things were mostly familiar but also deeply strange and beautiful and terrifying, and which I could access through my own home and that I felt, most of the time while I was there, no one else would fully understand like I did, like it was impossible to express to anyone on the other side what it was like there. And that was scary but also kind of great, for a thirteen, fourteen, fifteen year old girl. So I definitely felt like what I did online, music-downloading included, was very private and sacred and mine.
So when my sister found these programs on the computer and started using them to download her own stuff, which was only marginally more embarassing than what I was listening to, it completely wrecked my entire concept of ownership. It was like she was using my wardrobe to access my secret world and while she was there she was listening to my sectret MP3s that I had harvested on my own. And of course I could always tell when she was doing this because I could hear her playing the music. It drove me crazy. I remember exploding at her once—I was watching TV in the other room and she was on the computer and I heard, like, god who knows what, some old weird Modest Mouse song that I probably didn’t even like but some college girl whose “weblog” I had started following had said they were cool so I downloaded it—anyway my little sister was listening to it and it was like I’d found her going through my closet or something, but worse, maybe even like I’d found her going through my diary, but worse than that even, because it was as if she was claiming some kind of ownership over it by playing it for herself. But NO, it was MINE! Mine mine mine! And I think I even ran into computer room yelling at her about that. Like, telling her she was not allowed to listen to it because I had downloaded it, it was mine, not hers, get her own. Yes, I actually do think that I suggested to her that she download her own copy of the same MP3 and that she should only be allowed to listen to that one, not mine.
So then probably our mom came in and told us to chill out and for me to stop acting so ridiculous and just let my sister listen to the dang songs because I sure as hell didn’t own them—I had illegally downloaded them, remember, and that is maybe the ultimate irony, or not quite but still quite funny. And then at some point after that when my rage had subsided (days, weeks, months, not sure how long that took), I realiezd, oh wait. This is actually pretty great. My sister likes the same music I like. She is listening to the music I downloaded because she likes it, and she is downloading other music that I have actually not heard of and that’s pretty good too. And aside from a brief but very intense Evan and Jaron fixation, which I’m sure she would also admit to being pretty inexplicable and embarassing (we both partook in the Hanson-love so I can’t knock that), she has basically held steady as someone whose musical tastes are compatible with my own, who I enjoy enjoying the same music as, who I enjoy sharing music with and seeing shows with and getting excited about music with. I know I would have come around to this eventually, and I know that even if we did wind up liking completely different stuff I would still respect that and probably find value in that, but as it has turned out sharing music (and books and TV shows and movies) has been a real and steady source of sisterly bonding for us, and makes being together just that much more fun, and I can’t believe it was once a source of real anger and frustration that she would “dare” like the same things I liked.
And I think that experience with her made me generally more open to other people liking what I like—and not just being OK with that but being excited about sharing, happy to be open with what I love. And it has also made me increasingly impatient with people who are not OK with that, who get fussy about keeping what they love and know private and secluded, because I now necessarily associate it with being a completely unreasonable fifteen-year-old music snob unwilling to share the things most precious to her even with her own flesh and blood.
So. That is what I think about when I encounter stuff like this.
Also, this hot mess.
(Perpetua has a more succinct take on the NYT piece here.)